310 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
310 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Network Working Group G. Malkin
|
|||
|
Request for Comments: 1782 Xylogics, Inc.
|
|||
|
Updates: 1350 A. Harkin
|
|||
|
Category: Standards Track Hewlett Packard Co.
|
|||
|
March 1995
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TFTP Option Extension
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Status of this Memo
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
|
|||
|
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
|
|||
|
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
|
|||
|
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
|
|||
|
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Abstract
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Trivial File Transfer Protocol [1] is a simple, lock-step, file
|
|||
|
transfer protocol which allows a client to get or put a file onto a
|
|||
|
remote host. This document describes a simple extension to TFTP to
|
|||
|
allow option negotiation prior to the file transfer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Introduction
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The option negotiation mechanism proposed in this document is a
|
|||
|
backward-compatible extension to the TFTP protocol. It allows file
|
|||
|
transfer options to be negotiated prior to the transfer using a
|
|||
|
mechanism which is consistent with TFTPs Request Packet format. The
|
|||
|
mechanism is kept simple by enforcing a request-respond-acknowledge
|
|||
|
sequence, similar to the lock-step approach taken by TFTP itself.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
While the option negotiation mechanism is general purpose, in that
|
|||
|
many types of options may be negotiated, it was created to support
|
|||
|
the Blocksize option defined in [2]. Additional options are defined
|
|||
|
in [3].
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This document assumes reader familiarity with the TFTP specification
|
|||
|
[1] and its terminology.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Packet Formats
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TFTP options are appended to the Read Request and Write Request
|
|||
|
packets. A new type of TFTP packet, the Option Acknowledgment
|
|||
|
(OACK), is used to acknowledge a client's option negotiation request.
|
|||
|
A new error code, 8, is hereby defined to indicate that a transfer
|
|||
|
should be terminated due to option negotiation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Malkin & Harkin [Page 1]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 1782 TFTP Option Extension March 1995
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Options are appended to a TFTP Read Request or Write Request packet
|
|||
|
as follows:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+-->
|
|||
|
| opc |filename| 0 | mode | 0 | opt1 | 0 | value1 | 0 | <
|
|||
|
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+-->
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
>-------+---+---~~---+---+
|
|||
|
< optN | 0 | valueN | 0 |
|
|||
|
>-------+---+---~~---+---+
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The "0"s shown in these illustrations and the ones below are all
|
|||
|
all zero octets, i.e., NULL terminators for the preceeding
|
|||
|
fields.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
opc
|
|||
|
The opcode field contains either a 1, for Read Requests, or 2,
|
|||
|
for Write Requests, as defined in [1].
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
filename
|
|||
|
The name of the file to be read or written, as defined in [1].
|
|||
|
This is a NULL-terminated field.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
mode
|
|||
|
The mode of the file transfer: "netascii", "octet", or "mail",
|
|||
|
as defined in [1]. This is a NULL-terminated field.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
opt1
|
|||
|
The first option, in case-insensitive ASCII (e.g., "blksize").
|
|||
|
This is a NULL-terminated ASCII field.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
value1
|
|||
|
The value associated with the first option, in case-insensitive
|
|||
|
ASCII. This is a NULL-terminated field.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
optN, valueN
|
|||
|
The final option/value pair. Each NULL-terminated field is
|
|||
|
specified in case-insensitive ASCII.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The options and values are all NULL-terminated, in keeping with the
|
|||
|
original request format. If multiple options are to be negotiated,
|
|||
|
they are appended to each other. The order in which options are
|
|||
|
specified is not significant. The maximum size of a request packet
|
|||
|
is 512 octets.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Malkin & Harkin [Page 2]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 1782 TFTP Option Extension March 1995
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The OACK packet has the following format:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+
|
|||
|
| opc | opt1 | 0 | value1 | 0 | optN | 0 | valueN | 0 |
|
|||
|
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
opc
|
|||
|
The opcode field contains a 6, for Option Acknowledgment.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
opt1
|
|||
|
The first option acknowledgment, copied from the original
|
|||
|
request.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
value1
|
|||
|
The acknowledged value associated with the first option. If
|
|||
|
and how this value may differ from the original request is
|
|||
|
detailed in the specification for the option.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
optN, valueN
|
|||
|
The final option/value acknowledgment pair.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Negotiation Protocol
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The client appends options at the end of the Read Request or Write
|
|||
|
request packet, as shown above. Any number of options may be
|
|||
|
specified; however, an option may only be specified once. The order
|
|||
|
of the options is not significant.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If the server supports option negotiation, and it recognizes one or
|
|||
|
more of the options specified in the request packet, the server may
|
|||
|
respond with an Options Acknowledgment (OACK). Each option the
|
|||
|
server recognizes, and accepts the value for, is included in the
|
|||
|
OACK. Some options may allow alternate values to be proposed, but
|
|||
|
this is an option specific feature. The server must not include in
|
|||
|
the OACK any option which had not been specifically requested by the
|
|||
|
client; that is, only the client may initiate option negotiation.
|
|||
|
Options which the server does not support should be omitted from the
|
|||
|
OACK; they must not cause an ERROR packet to be generated. If the
|
|||
|
value of a supported option is invalid, the specification for that
|
|||
|
option will indicate whether the server should simply omit the option
|
|||
|
from the OACK, respond with an alternate value, or send an ERROR
|
|||
|
packet, with error code 8, to terminate the transfer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
An option not acknowledged by the server must be ignored by the
|
|||
|
client and server as if it were never requested. If multiple options
|
|||
|
were requested, the client must use those options which were
|
|||
|
acknowledged by the server and must not use those options which were
|
|||
|
not acknowledged by the server.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Malkin & Harkin [Page 3]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 1782 TFTP Option Extension March 1995
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
When the client appends options to the end of a Read Request packet,
|
|||
|
three possible responses may be returned by the server:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OACK - acknowledge of Read Request and the options;
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DATA - acknowledge of Read Request, but not the options;
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ERROR - the request has been denied.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
When the client appends options to the end of a Write Request packet,
|
|||
|
three possible responses may be returned by the server:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OACK - acknowledge of Write Request and the options;
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ACK - acknowledge of Write Request, but not the options;
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ERROR - the request has been denied.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If a server implementation does not support option negotiation, it
|
|||
|
will likely ignore any options appended to the client's request. In
|
|||
|
this case, the server will return a DATA packet for a Read Request
|
|||
|
and an ACK packet for a Write Request establishing normal TFTP data
|
|||
|
transfer. In the event that a server returns an error for a request
|
|||
|
which carries an option, the client may attempt to repeat the request
|
|||
|
without appending any options. This implementation option would
|
|||
|
handle servers which consider extraneous data in the request packet
|
|||
|
to be erroneous.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Depending on the original transfer request there are two ways for a
|
|||
|
client to confirm acceptance of a server's OACK. If the transfer was
|
|||
|
initiated with a Read Request, then an ACK (with the data block
|
|||
|
number set to 0) is sent by the client to confirm the values in the
|
|||
|
server's OACK packet. If the transfer was initiated with a Write
|
|||
|
Request, then the client begins the transfer with the first DATA
|
|||
|
packet, using the negotiated values. If the client rejects the OACK,
|
|||
|
then it sends an ERROR packet, with error code 8, to the server and
|
|||
|
the transfer is terminated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Once a client acknowledges an OACK, with an appropriate non-error
|
|||
|
response, that client has agreed to use only the options and values
|
|||
|
returned by the server. Remember that the server cannot request an
|
|||
|
option; it can only respond to them. If the client receives an OACK
|
|||
|
containing an unrequested option, it should respond with an ERROR
|
|||
|
packet, with error code 8, and terminate the transfer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Malkin & Harkin [Page 4]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 1782 TFTP Option Extension March 1995
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Examples
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Read Request
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
client server
|
|||
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|1|foofile|0|octet|0|blksize|0|1432|0| --> RRQ
|
|||
|
<-- |6|blksize|0|1432|0| OACK
|
|||
|
|4|0| --> ACK
|
|||
|
<-- |3|1| 1432 octets of data | DATA
|
|||
|
|4|1| --> ACK
|
|||
|
<-- |3|2| 1432 octets of data | DATA
|
|||
|
|4|2| --> ACK
|
|||
|
<-- |3|3|<1432 octets of data | DATA
|
|||
|
|4|3| --> ACK
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Write Request
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
client server
|
|||
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
|2|barfile|0|octet|0|blksize|0|2048|0| --> RRQ
|
|||
|
<-- |6|blksize|0|2048|0| OACK
|
|||
|
|3|1| 2048 octets of data | --> DATA
|
|||
|
<-- |4|1| ACK
|
|||
|
|3|2| 2048 octets of data | --> DATA
|
|||
|
<-- |4|2| ACK
|
|||
|
|3|3|<2048 octets of data | --> DATA
|
|||
|
<-- |4|3| ACK
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Security Considerations
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
References
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[1] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", STD 33, RFC 1350,
|
|||
|
MIT, July 1992.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[2] Malkin, G., and A. Harkin, "TFTP Blocksize Option", RFC 1783,
|
|||
|
Xylogics, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., March 1995.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[3] Malkin, G., and A. Harkin, A., "TFTP Timeout Interval and
|
|||
|
Transfer Size Options", RFC 1784, Xylogics, Inc., Hewlett Packard
|
|||
|
Co., March 1995.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Malkin & Harkin [Page 5]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
RFC 1782 TFTP Option Extension March 1995
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Authors' Addresses
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Gary Scott Malkin
|
|||
|
Xylogics, Inc.
|
|||
|
53 Third Avenue
|
|||
|
Burlington, MA 01803
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Phone: (617) 272-8140
|
|||
|
EMail: gmalkin@xylogics.com
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Art Harkin
|
|||
|
Internet Services Project
|
|||
|
Information Networks Division
|
|||
|
19420 Homestead Road MS 43LN
|
|||
|
Cupertino, CA 95014
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Phone: (408) 447-3755
|
|||
|
EMail: ash@cup.hp.com
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Malkin & Harkin [Page 6]
|