Clarify wording of license information in README.

This text historically was copied verbatim from rust-lang/rust's own README [1]
with the intention of licensing projects the same as rustc's own license, namely
a dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license. The clause about "various BSD-like licenses"
isn't actually correct for almost all projects other than rust-lang/rust and
the wording around "both" was slightly ambiguous.

This commit updates the wording to match more precisely what's in the
standard library [2], namely clarifying that there aren't any BSD-like licenses
in this repository and that the source is licensable under either license, at
your own discretion.

[1]: f0fe716dbc (license)
[2]: f0fe716dbc/src/libstd/lib.rs (L5-L9)
This commit is contained in:
Alex Crichton 2017-10-30 14:50:58 -07:00
parent a3f02da0c3
commit 9d2f3453d1

View file

@ -24,8 +24,17 @@ used for that support.
# License
`toml-rs` is primarily distributed under the terms of both the MIT license and
the Apache License (Version 2.0), with portions covered by various BSD-like
licenses.
This project is licensed under either of
See LICENSE-APACHE, and LICENSE-MIT for details.
* Apache License, Version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
* MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or
http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
at your option.
### Contribution
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted
for inclusion in Serde by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be
dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.